PM Paetongtarn’s absence sparks debate over invasive fish issue
Thailand Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra’s decision to skip the opening of the new House of Representatives session yesterday, December 12, sparked a contentious debate between the opposition and the ruling Pheu Thai Party.
Nattacha Boonchaiinsawat, a Bangkok representative from the opposition People’s Party (PP), voiced his frustration, expressing a desire for the prime minister to address the public on efforts to curb the spread of the invasive blackchin tilapia fish.
This species of fish has reportedly infiltrated numerous waterways, contradicting the government’s claims of improvement. Nattacha emphasised the gravity of the situation, noting that it necessitated direct attention from the prime minister due to its impact on various ministries.
Instead of attending the parliamentary session, PM Paetongtarn delivered a nationwide televised address from the National Broadcasting Services of Thailand, discussing her government’s performance and policy initiatives. She had previously indicated that attending yesterday’s session was not feasible.
In her absence, Agriculture Minister Narumon Pinyosinwat was delegated to attend the session but she also did not make an appearance, citing other commitments. This absence prompted Nattacha to express his disappointment.
“I intended to use the first day of the Parliament session to ask questions of the highest leader in the government, the prime minister.
“The prime minister said she wanted to answer questions in Parliament. However, today was not appropriate. I have to ask what kind of person she is to say that the first day of work is inappropriate for work?”
The PP MP further criticised the prime minister’s response to pressing issues.
“The suffering of our fellow citizens awaits solutions, and the people’s representatives want to use the mechanisms of the Parliament to perform their duties. You just answered something as simple as this by saying ‘I was busy.'”
Toetchat Chaipong, a Pheu Thai MP representing Chiang Rai, countered the criticism by reminding Nattacha that he couldn’t criticise the prime minister so bluntly.
Deputy Finance Minister Julapun Amornvivat, speaking on behalf of the government, clarified that initially, there was no parliamentary meeting scheduled for yesterday. The session was initially planned for next week, but the timetable was adjusted at the last minute.
Meanwhile, the 38 year old Thai premier is set to leave Bangkok today to attend a Pheu Thai Party meeting in Hua Hin for two days. She is expected to arrive in the resort town this morning, travelling by train along with 400 party members and officials, reported Bangkok Post.
Frequently Asked Questions
Here are some common questions asked about this news.
Why did Prime Minister Paetongtarn choose a televised address over the parliamentary session?
She prioritised a nationwide address to discuss government performance, suggesting a strategic communication choice.
How might the absence of key leaders affect the perception of government priorities?
It can raise doubts about commitment to pressing issues, potentially influencing public trust.
What if the invasive blackchin tilapia issue remains unaddressed?
The ecological and economic impacts could escalate, affecting waterways and local industries.
How does the opposition’s criticism highlight the importance of parliamentary engagement?
It underscores the need for direct dialogue and accountability in addressing national concerns.
What does the rescheduling of the parliamentary session reveal about government planning?
It suggests potential challenges in coordination and communication within legislative processes.
Latest Thailand News
