Thai parties unite to block anti-coup legislation
A political debate is brewing in Thailand as the United Thai Nation Party (UTN) and the opposition Palang Pracharat Party (PPRP) firmly rejected a proposed legislative amendment to prevent future military coups. The bill, drafted by Prayut Siripanich, a Member of Parliament from the ruling Pheu Thai Party, seeks to alter the Defence Ministry Administration Act.
Akradet Wongpitakroj, a spokesperson and MP for the UTN, reiterated the party’s opposition to any legislation enabling political intervention within the Defence Ministry. He stated that this opposition is consistent with the party’s stance against a similar proposal by the now-defunct Move Forward party.
“Any change to the regulations of the Defence Ministry must be carefully considered. The armed forces are major national institutions where security is concerned.”
PPRP spokesperson Piya Tavichai also voiced strong opposition, arguing that the bill could potentially weaken the military and expose it to political manipulation.
The contention lies in the proposed bill’s provision, which would grant politicians greater influence than military chiefs in deciding the annual reshuffling of generals. Piya stressed that military leaders, who possess intimate knowledge of their personnel, should hold sway in these decisions rather than politicians who rotate power post-elections.
Current laws empower armed forces chiefs to propose officer reshuffles to His Majesty King Maha Vajiralongkorn Phra Vajiraklaochaoyuhua for royal approval, a mechanism designed to keep political influences at bay.
The UTN and PPRP’s opposition aligns with the stance of another coalition member, the Bhumjaithai Party. This consolidated resistance highlights the contentious nature of the proposed changes.
Prayut Siripanich, the Pheu Thai MP behind the bill, introduced it to deter the country’s recurring coups. The bill would authorise the Cabinet to approve military reshuffles suggested by armed forces leaders and allow the prime minister and the Cabinet to suspend military officers as a preemptive measure against coups.
Nevertheless, Prayut indicated a willingness to reconsider the bill if it encounters substantial opposition. He expressed an openness to withdraw the proposal from Parliament for further revisions if necessary.
An opinion survey launched by Parliament on Prayut’s bill showed significant public disapproval. As of Monday, December 9, 27,113 individuals participated, with 72.47% opposing the bill and 27.53% in favour. This survey indicates a divided public opinion, further complicating the political landscape surrounding this legislative proposal, reported Bangkok Post.
Frequently Asked Questions
Here are some common questions asked about this news.
Why might military influence in Thailand be seen as crucial for national security?
Military influence is considered vital as it ensures stability and prevents political interference, safeguarding national security interests.
How could granting politicians more control over military reshuffles impact Thailand’s political landscape?
It might lead to increased political influence in military matters, potentially reducing the military’s autonomy and altering power dynamics.
What if the proposed bill to prevent coups gains support despite current opposition?
Gaining support could lead to significant shifts in military-civil relations, potentially reducing coup occurrences but increasing political involvement in defense.
How does public disapproval of the bill reflect on Thailand’s political climate?
Public disapproval indicates a deep-seated divide and scepticism towards altering military governance, highlighting the complexities in reforming coup prevention strategies.
What are the potential consequences of maintaining the status quo in military reshuffles?
Preserving current practices might sustain military autonomy but risks perpetuating cycles of coups and political instability.
