His move to tone down the bill by removing an article and giving up his characteristic determination to push the bill for deliberation in Parliament is not unexpected.
“I’ve assigned MP Piraphan [Palusuk, Pheu Thai-Yasothon] and MP Surajit [Yontrakul, Pheu Thai-Maha Sarakham] to submit the bill to the House on May 23 [tomorrow]. It will be fine if they don’t do it,” he said.
He is believed to have softened his stance because the bill has met opposition from all sides – both from opponents of former PM Thaksin Shinawatra, as well as his supporters.
The red shirts do not want a blanket amnesty bill to be enacted because they want members of the previous government and military leaders punished for the 2010 crackdown. And many Pheu Thai MPs don’t want Chalerm’s bill considered in the House, as they believe it will provide a cause for Thaksin’s opponents to launch an all-out protest against the government.
Chalerm removed Article 5, which sought to provide financial compensation to people affected by political violence and crackdowns. He said the article was removed so it would not rely on the national budget, and thus, would not need to be endorsed by Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra.
However, the real motive behind removing the article may be that he wants to free Yingluck from being held responsible for this controversial bill.
Chalerm claims that removing the article takes away the bill’s link to the national budget. However, the bill sought to undo punishment meted out to Thaksin, including seizure of his assets, and if passed, the government would have had to return Bt46.37 billion – a sum that would have to be taken from the national budget.
Article 143 in the Constitution states that any bill requiring the government to pay out national funds needs to be endorsed by the premier. The charter also authorises the House speaker and chairpersons of House panels to decide if a bill is considered linked to the national budget or not.
The opposition, meanwhile, plans to seek a ruling from the Constitutional Court if Chalerm’s bill does get sent to the House. Yet, Chalerm’s “backdown” may just be a tactical move. This was made clear after Pheu Thai Party came up with a half-hearted resolution over the bill yesterday, and the party’s de-facto boss Thaksin made no mention of it during his Skype address to the red-shirt rally on Sunday.
Thaksin just said he backed the bill put forward by Samut Prakan MP Worachai Hema, which seeks to absolve any wrongdoing by demonstrators – not their leaders.
Meanwhile, in its resolution yesterday, Pheu Thai said Chalerm’s bill was a personal matter between the deputy PM and a group of MPs, and that it was not related to the party.
“Pheu Thai has resolved to support Worachai’s bill and will not take up Chalerm’s version for deliberation at the same time,” Pheu Thai spokesman Prompong Nopparit told reporters after the party meeting. “Chalerm may sponsor the bill but it will not have anything to do with the party.”
A Pheu Thai source admitted that Chalerm’s bill “would become a magnet to attract opposition against the government. But the party let Chalerm go ahead to test the waters and see if it does get strong opposition. It was decided that if the opposition were strong, we would retreat. The prime minister and Pheu Thai are not related to it so there will be no damage against us,” the source said. “However, if the opposition is not strong, the bill might get enacted.”
But opposition to Chalerm’s bill is clearly very strong.
The red shirts are against it because they want former PM Abhisit Vejjajiva and his then-deputy Suthep Thaugsuban to be punished.
And Democrat MP for Nakhon Si Thammarat Thepthai Senpong said the opposition would also put up a strong fight against it.
“At the House debate, we will use every effort to point out that this bill seeks to benefit only Thaksin. Though the Democrat Party is a minority in the House, we will do our best to block it,” Thepthai promised. He added that his party would employ every House regulation to delay the bill’s passage.
Chalerm’s bill, they expect, would allow the now-weak People’s Alliance for Democracy to boost its strength and come out to oppose any return of money to the former PM and absolving Thaksin of any wrongdoing over recent conflicts.
PHUKET: The Rural Doctors Society and its allies will protest in front of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra’s residence from June 6 onward to press for the dismissal of Public Health Minister Pradit Sinthawanarong.
They have accused Pradit of many wrongdoings, including an attempt to undermine the Government Pharmaceutical Organisation (GPO). The protest plan was unveiled yesterday around the time the Cabinet approved the GPO board’s decision to sack GPO managing director Witit Artavatkun.
Thai Kidney Club of Thailand chairman Saharat Sarapaiwanich said someone had secretly plotted to destroy the GPO and push for a co-payment system at the expense of patients.
“Such actions will put kidney patients in serious trouble,” he said.
As part of the protest, Saharat said more than 50 kidney patients would undergo dialysis in front of Yingluck’s house on June 6.
“If she ignores us, the number of patients in front of her house will increase,” he said.
Rural Doctors Society chairman Kriengsak Watcharanukulkiat attacked Pradit for many controversial policies including the pay-for-performance system for medical workers and an alleged plot to privatise the GPO.
“He’s unethical,” Kriengsak said.
Pradit, who is now in Geneva, has yet to respond. Deputy Public Health Minister Cholnan Srikaew, however, urged all sides to embrace mutual discussions.
“Please talk, otherwise problems can’t be solved,” he said.
In regard to the plan to arrange dialysis in front of Yingluck’s home, he asked protesters to think about patients’ safety.
Cholnan dismissed a suggestion that Witit was kicked out because he tried to resist the transfer of Bt75 million from the GPO to the Public Health Ministry.
“I don’t believe he was sacked on this ground. Otherwise, he would be able to easily fight against the GPO board’s decision to sack him,” the deputy public health minister said.
Witit said yesterday he had not yet planned to lodge a complaint against his dismissal, because he had yet to see an investigation report about his “wrongdoing”.
The GPO board says it sacked Witit over alleged irregularities in the procurement of raw material to produce paracetamol.
Witit said he would be looking for a new job and would never return to the government sector.
Cholnan, however, insisted the termination of Witit’s employment contract was in line with proper procedures. “I hardly needed to explain anything when his proposed dismissal was put before the Cabinet,” the deputy minister said.
Join the conversation and have your say on Thailand news published on The Thaiger.
Thaiger Talk is our new Thaiger Community where you can join the discussion on everything happening in Thailand right now.
Please note that articles are not posted to the forum instantly and can take up to 20 min before being visible. Click for more information and the Thaiger Talk Guidelines.