Court rejects anti-corruption agency’s review bid in Prawit’s wristwatch probe

Picture courtesy of MGR Online

The Supreme Administrative Court yesterday upheld a prior court’s decision against the National Anti-Corruption Commission’s (NACC) request for a case review involving luxury wristwatches linked to former Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwon. The court found no basis for the review, which would require the NACC to disclose details of their investigation into the wristwatch controversy to political activist Veera Somkhwamkid.

The NACC in December 2018, with a 5-3 vote, found no grounds for accusations that Prawit had falsely declared his wealth. This followed his failure to include 22 luxury watches and rings in his asset declaration. Prawit maintained that these items belonged to friends and were returned thereafter.

Advertisements

The probe was instigated following Prawit’s public appearance at a Government House event on December 4, 2017, where he was seen wearing a platinum Richard Mille RM 029 wristwatch valued at roughly 2.5 million baht (US$ 68,530) and a diamond ring, reported Bangkok Post.

Following the NACC’s dismissal of the case, Veera petitioned the Supreme Administrative Court for the disclosure of investigation details, which was granted. The court’s ruling required the NACC to disclose three types of information to Veera: fact-finding reports, the views of the anti-graft officials overseeing the case, and the NACC’s meeting report on the case.

However, the NACC provided Veera with only two sets of information, withholding the views of the anti-graft officials overseeing the case.

In an August interview, NACC secretary-general Niwatchai Kasemmongkol argued that maintaining the agency’s integrity necessitated the redaction of witness names in the documents given to Veera, to safeguard the identities and integrity of the witnesses.

In April, activist Veera Somkwamkid announced his intention to impeach members of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) for disregarding a court order that required them to divulge details about their investigation into the luxury wristwatch saga involving Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwon.

Advertisements

Veera accused the NACC of defying the Supreme Administrative Court’s order in an interview, stating that the court had ruled that disclosure must be completed within 15 days of the order, which was passed on Friday, April 21. To read more click HERE

Follow more of The Thaiger’s latest stories on our new Facebook page HERE.

Thailand News

Mitch Connor

Mitch is a Bangkok resident, having relocated from Southern California, via Florida in 2022. He studied journalism before dropping out of college to teach English in South America. After returning to the US, he spent 4 years working for various online publishers before moving to Thailand.

Related Articles