Business
Phuket Business: AMCHAM’s warnings

PHUKET: “Caution” was a common theme echoed at the American Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAM) Greater Phuket Chapter’s final meeting of the year, held recently at the Royal Phuket Marina.
The evening featured three informative presentations, courtesy of AMCHAM Thailand’s legal council, which provided a wealth of valuable advice to expat business operators – as well as those considering conducting business here.
The first speaker, Douglas D Mancill, shed light on some of the restrictions and risks associated with Thailand’s Foreign Business Act (FBA). Enacted in 1999, the FBA divides businesses into three categories, he noted.
“The first category comprises businesses that a foreign company simply cannot operate. It is more difficult to obtain a Category Two business license, which requires approval from cabinet. A transport business is an example of a type of business in this category…
“The government is a little more lax in granting category three alien licenses, however,” he said.
Mr Mancill emphasized that the statutes and sanctions of the FBA, “have a lot of teeth”:
“Violations, if imposed in full, can mean up to three years in prison, a million baht fine and a dissolution of the [Thai incorporation of the] business… The Department of Business Development (DBD) has determined that at least 484 businesses have violated the FBA, and are starting to be pro-active and pursue prosecution,” he warned, adding that the Department of Special Investigations (DSI) – the Thai counterpart of the US Federal Bureau Investigations (FBI) – has become more active in monitoring and investigating foreign businesses.
A partner at Bangkok-based law firm, Price Sanond Prabhas & Wynne, Mr Mancill highlighted some of the ambiguities of the FBA, specifically with respect to violations that involve illegal “nominee shareholding”.
Mancill, an American citizen and Thailand expat of 14 years, said that: “The statute that covers this doesn’t use the word ‘nominee’…it refers to aiding and abetting foreigners in operating a business, which is subject to the FBA.”
Mr Mancill went on to explain that legislature in the Kingdom distinguishes between “control” of a company and the actual share ownership. He says the latter is more relevant in the eyes of Thai law.
“What the MoC (Ministry of Commerce) and DBD look at during a registration of a new business is whether the Thai party actually has the ability to purchase their shares. The second thing they look for, is whether the Thai party actually made the investment and paid for the share.They often require a bank statement going back six months for verification.”
Thus, he advised expat business owners, shareholders and/or their respective Thai partners to be especially careful when signing certain documents, which may implicate them in a violation of the FBA.
Moving on to the Treaty of Amity and Commerce, the long-running bilateral agreement between the USA and Thailand, which provides juristic entities [people doing business] from either country certain exception clauses in the other party’s jurisdiction for trade and business.
“I often get asked when this treaty is going to expire… In order for that [the treaty to expire] to happen, either one of the parties – Thailand or the US – would have to give one year’s notice of their intention to cancel the treaty. This has not happened, and thus the treaty is not due to expire.”
The next speaker, Michael Ramirez, a senior consultant for the Tilleke & Gibbins Dispute Resolution Group, shed some light on trends in anti-corruption laws:
“With corruption, most people tend to think about the public-to-private type, but actually a lot of the corruption cases involve the private-to-private sector.”
He pointed out that Thailand was not one of the signatories of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Anti-bribery convention in 1999, which had a total 38 signatories, most of which were Western countries.
However, the country was part of the ADB – OECD Anti-Corruption Initiative, 2010, which involved 28 Asia-Pacific nations, who made a commitment to “criminalize bribing of foreign officials” and “sanction businesses involved in bribery.”
Nonetheless, Michael said that there is gradual progress taking place in curbing corruption in Thailand in respect to the enactment and enforcement of laws.
“When you begin to accept that corruption is part of doing business, then you are in some ways facilitating that corruption,” he concluded.
Finally, Olaf Duensing, co-founder of the legal advisory and services firm Duensing Kippen Ltd, highlighted the importance of including an arbitration clause in business contracts.
Licensed to practice law in Germany and a member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (MCIArb), he has worked as a legal consultant in Thailand for 11 years. Olaf said that it is important to include various details in this clause.
“In addition to the arbitrators, who must be independent and impartial, it is also important to identify the jurisdiction and language that the arbitration will be conducted [in],” he said.
“All parties must agree to the arbitration clause. It cannot be enforced if all parties did not sign to it. However, once signed, you can not back out,” he said.
One important point he made is that parties involved should review and consider any and all relevant laws in the respective jurisdiction, which might impact the award or enforcement of an arbitration decision.
For more information see: Duensing Kippen (duensingkippen.com); Tilleke & Gibbins International (tilleke.com) and Price Sanond Prabhas & Wynne (pricesanond.com).
— Steven Layne
Keep in contact with The Thaiger by following our Facebook page.
Never miss out on future posts by following The Thaiger.
Business
Governments & old media versus social media – who will win? | VIDEO

We look at the recent changes made by the Australian and Indian governments to except control over the world’s biggest social media platforms. India has issued strict new rules for Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms just weeks after the Indian government attempted to pressure Twitter to take down social media accounts it deemed, well, anti social. There is now an open battle between the rise of social media platforms and the governments and ‘old’ media that have been able to maintain a certain level of control over the ‘message’ for the last century. Who will win?
The rules require any social media company to create three roles within India… a “compliance officer” who ensures they follow local laws; a “grievance officer” who addresses complaints from Indian social media users; and a “contact person” who can actually be contacted by lawyers and other aggrieved Indian parties… 24/7.
The democratisation of the news model, with social media as its catalyst, will continue to baffle traditional media and governments who used to enjoy a level of control over what stories get told. The battles of Google and Facebook, with the governments of India and Australia will be followed in plenty of other countries as well.
At the root of all discussions will be the difference between what governments THINK social media is all about and the reality about how quickly the media landscape has changed. You’ll get to read about it first, on a social media platform… probably on the screen you’re watching this news story right now.
Keep in contact with The Thaiger by following our Facebook page.
Never miss out on future posts by following The Thaiger.
Business
The social media giants in battle with ‘old’ media and world governments | VIDEO

“The rules signal greater willingness by countries around the world to rein in big tech firms such as Google, Facebook and Twitter that the governments fear have become too powerful with little accountability.”
India has issued strict new rules for Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms just weeks after the Indian government attempted to pressure Twitter to take down social media accounts it deemed, well, anti social.
The rules require any social media company to create three roles within India… a “compliance officer” who ensures they follow local laws; a “grievance officer” who addresses complaints from Indian social media users; and a “contact person” who can actually be contacted by lawyers and other aggrieved Indian parties… 24/7.
The companies are also being made to publish a compliance report each month with details about how many complaints they’ve received and the action they took.
They’ll also be required to remove ‘some’ types of content including “full or partial nudity,” any “sexual act” or “impersonations including morphed images”
The democratisation of the news model, with social media as its catalyst, will continue to baffle traditional media and governments who used to enjoy a level of control over what stories get told.
The battles of Google and Facebook, with the governments of India and Australia will be followed in plenty of other countries as well.
At the root of all discussions will be the difference between what governments THINK social media is all about and the reality about how quickly the media landscape has changed. You’ll get to read about it first, on a social media platform… probably on the screen you’re watching this news story right now.
Keep in contact with The Thaiger by following our Facebook page.
Never miss out on future posts by following The Thaiger.
Business
Turbulence ahead for Thailand’s aviation industry | VIDEO

When the airlines, in particular, were asking the government to put their hands in their pockets for some relief funding in August last year, it was genuinely thought that international tourists would be coming back for the high season in December and January. At the very least local tourists and expats would head back to the skies over the traditional holiday break. And surely the Chinese would be back for Chinese New Year?
As we know now, none of that happened. A resurge in cases started just south of Bangkok on December 20 last year, just before Christmas, kicking off another round of restrictions, pretty much killing off any possibility of a high season ‘bump’ for the tourist industry. Airlines slashed flights from their schedule, and hotels, which had dusted off their reception desks for the surge of tourists, shut their doors again.
Domestically, the hotel business saw 6 million room nights in the government’s latest stimulus campaign fully redeemed. But the air ticket quota of 2 million seats still has over 1.3 million seats unused. Local tourists mostly skipped flights and opted for destinations within driving distance of their homes.
As for international tourism… well that still seems months or years away, even now.
Keep in contact with The Thaiger by following our Facebook page.
Never miss out on future posts by following The Thaiger.
- Coronavirus (Covid-19)2 days ago
International travellers allowed to transit Thailand from Monday
- Coronavirus (Covid-19)2 days ago
PM Prayut postponing Covid‐19 vaccination citing paperwork issues
- Crime3 days ago
Motorbike taxi attacked tourist in Pattaya because he was annoyed
- Bangkok2 days ago
Bangkok police raid house where model died after playing hostess
- Crime3 days ago
Thai man accidentally kills himself with homemade bomb
- Bangkok1 day ago
Woman talks about the life of a Thai “pretty” after model’s death
- Eastern Thailand3 days ago
Roadtrippers take a break at petrol station only to find dead body under car
- Myanmar2 days ago
Myanmar’s representative to UN urges strong action against military after increasing violence against protesters