Bangkok
History: Bangkok for the holidays raises query about Victory Monument

PHUKET: People who live in Bangkok are probably familiar with the Victory Monument. For those visiting, however, there is a good chance you will spend some time stuck in traffic in this famous circle, and this might cause you to contemplate what it commemorates.
One of Bangkok’s iconic landmarks, the Victory Monument is located at the intersection of Phahonyothin Road, Phaya Thai Road and Ratchawithi Road.
The design of the monument is strange at first sight. It looks like an Egyptian obelisk, pointing sharply into the sky. But it was actually designed to look like five bayonets clasped together, as a symbol of military victory. Four military figures, representing the army, navy, air force and police, guard the four sides of the monument.
Most Bangkok residents know the monument well. They know to avoid it because of the horrendous traffic in the roundabout. BTS sky train passengers traveling toward Mo Chit will see a clear view of the monument as the train approaches the station named after it. Victory Monument – everyone knows its name, but few know the victory it commemorates.
To understand why the monument was built requires a bit of background history. During the reign of King Rama V, toward the end of the 19th century, Thailand, then known as Siam, was severely threatened by French colonial ambitions in Indo-China. The French had already annexed Vietnam and large parts of Cambodia.
In 1892, the French demanded that Laos, a region west of the Mekong River, then Siamese territory, be handed over to French control. They sent an envoy to the Siamese court in order to negotiate the handover. The Siamese, believing that the British would help them in resisting French colonial ambitions, refused to cede Laos.
Tension continued to rise and skirmishes between Siamese and French troops on the Laotian border escalated the conflict further. On June 5, 1893, Siamese troops ambushed a Vietnamese militia commanded by French Inspector Grosgurin, who at the time was confined to his sick bed in Kien Ket village. The ambush resulted in the razing of Kien Ket village, the killing of Grosgurin and the death of 17 Vietnamese soldiers.
The death of Grosgurin further soured Franco-Siamese relations to an all-time low. In France, political leaders called for hard action against the Siamese and reparations. In July 1893, the French sent two of their warships, the Inconstant and the gunboat Compte, up the Chao Phraya River toward Bangkok.
When the French vessels reached Paknam Fort, the Siamese fired their guns. The French returned fire and managed to break through the fort’s defenses unharmed. They sailed into Bangkok and stopped in front of the Grand Palace, the residence of King Rama V, guns aimed at the palace interior.
The French delivered their ultimatum to the Siamese on July 20, 1893. Hand over the Laotian territory west of the Mekong River, withdraw all Siamese garrisons from Laos, pay the French an equivalent amount of two million francs as reparation for the Paknam incident, and punish the officers involved in the earlier incidents that resulted in French deaths.
When the Siamese did not immediately comply with the demands, the French proceeded to blockade the mouth of the Chao Phraya River. At this point it seemed unlikely that the British were going to intervene to help Siam. On October 3, 1893, the Siamese agreed to the Franco-Siamese Treaty, in which they accepted all of France’s terms unconditionally. In doing so, Siam lost almost 40 per cent of its territory overnight.
Fast forward to the year 1940 when the French still controlled Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam but back home the fate of the French nation was in danger. In Europe, France and Great Britain declared war with Nazi Germany in 1939 when the Nazi’s invaded Poland. In 1940, the Nazis invaded France and won with surprising speed. In a matter of months Hitler was in Paris and the French government had collapsed.
The Nazis realized however that although France was captured and under Nazi control, a vast overseas empire could join Britain in the war effort if the French government were completely dissolved. Hitler therefore set up Vichy France, a puppet French government that nominally controlled the south of France, a part that was not formally annexed by the Germans.
In Thailand, Field Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkram, the prime minister, was well aware of how weak the French had become. In the eastern theater of the Second World War, the Thai government under Field Marshal Phibun had grown to become quite friendly with the Japanese, and the French foreign forces in Indo-China were cut off from their home government, ill equipped and demoralized.
Phibun used this as an opportunity to invade Laos and reclaim land that only a few decades ago rightly belonged to Thailand. The Royal Thai Air Force began conducting bombing raids over Vientiane, Phnom Penh, Sisophon and Battambang. The conflict quickly escalated with clashes on land and at sea. In January 1941, Japan stepped in to mediate. An armistice was signed and negotiations began. The Japanese, favoring Thailand, coerced the French to relinquish their hold on the disputed territories. As a result, the French ceded Battambang, Pailin, Siem Reap, Preah Vihear and parts of Luang Prabang to Thai control.
At home this was seen as a great triumph for the country and a personal victory for Prime Minister Phibun. Nationalist fervor was at an all-time high. Finally, Thais had won against the French colonialists and had managed to reclaim the lands they had lost many years ago. Amid the national celebrations, Phibun commissioned the building of the Victory Monument in order to commemorate this great victory.
The Second World War would not end well for Japan. In August 1945, with Nazi Germany defeated, the Japanese surrender followed, and the British and French resumed their control of territories in southeast Asia as they had had it before the war.
In October of 1946, Thailand was again forced to return the territories it had gained during the war of 1941 to French Indo-China. Today these territories remain parts of Laos and Cambodia.
— Anand Singh
Keep in contact with The Thaiger by following our Facebook page.Bangkok
Lilly wages war on Thailand’s plastic

Skipping school to glide through a dirty Bangkok ‘klong’ on a paddleboard, Lilly fishes out rubbish in her mission to clean up Thailand, where the average person uses eight plastic bags every single day. Single-use plastic is now on the radar in Thailand and has become a hot topic on social media.
“I am a kid at war,” the bubbly 12 year old says after a painstaking hour-long routine picking up cans, bags and bottles bobbing in the canal.
“I try to stay optimistic but I am also angry. Our world is disappearing.”
Thailand is the sixth largest global contributor to ocean pollution, and plastic is a scourge.
Whether it’s for wrapping up street food, takeaway coffees or for groceries, Thais use 3,000 single use bags per year – 12 times more than someone from the EU.
In June, Lilly won her first victory: she persuaded Central, a major supermarket in Bangkok, to stop giving out plastic bags in its stores once a week.
“I told myself that if the government did not listen to me, it would be necessary to speak directly to those who distribute plastic bags and convince them to stop.”
This month some of the biggest brands, including the operator of the ubiquitous 7-Eleven convenience stores, pledged to stop handing out single-use plastic bags by January next year.
Mindsets have started to shift this year with the deaths of several marine mammals whose stomachs were lined with plastic, stirring emotions.
The demise last month of a baby dugong was mourned on social media, reviving discussion in the government over a proposed ban on most single-use plastics by 2022.
But critics say along with new rules there need to be enforcement mechanisms such as fines.
For now young activists like Lilly can help capture attention.
“You might be able to tune out all of the evidence and advocacy in the world, but it’s very hard to ignore a child when they ask why we’re trashing the planet that they have to live on,” says Kakuko Nagatani-Yoshida, regional coordinator for chemicals, waste and air quality with UN Environment.

‘It’s up to us’
‘Lilly’ is Ralyn Satidtanasarn’s nickname.
The US-Thai youngster started campaigning at the age of eight after a seaside vacation in southern Thailand where she was horrified by a beach covered in rubbish.
“We cleaned up with my parents, but that was not helpful because other waste was thrown out by the sea the next day,” she recalls.
Then came the global movement initiated by 16 year old Greta Thunberg, who has become a key face in the battle against global warming.
Inspired by the young Swede, Lilly did sit-ins in front of the Thai government buildings.
“Greta Thunberg gave me confidence. When adults do not do anything, it’s up to us children to act,” she insists.
Though she often skips class to carry out her activism, she will not be in New York alongside Thunberg for a protest on September 20 just days before the UN climate conference.
“My place is here, the fight is also in Southeast Asia,” she says.
Even if she sometimes wants to take a break and “go play” like other kids, she also takes part in cleaning sessions organised by local association Trash Hero.
Other activists praise her but say she is up against massive corporate interests.
The main obstacle is the petrochemical industry, one of the main markets for plastics, accounting for 5 percent of Thailand’s GDP and tens of thousands of jobs.
“Lilly is a very good voice for the youth of this country but the lobbies are very powerful and that makes any change difficult,” concedes Nattapong Nithiuthai, who set up a company turning discarded waste into flip flops.
She can also count on the support of her parents, who help her write speeches to the UN and government officials.
Her mother, Sasie, herself a former environmental activist, adds: “At first, I thought it was a child’s fad, but Lilly hung on, so I decided to support her.”
SOURCE: Agence France-Presse
Keep in contact with The Thaiger by following our Facebook page.Bangkok
Thai poll favours new airport in Nakhon Pathom, west of Bangkok

Bangkok
FAIL! One in seven public transport vehicles didn’t pass safety tests

- One in seven public transport vehicles failed safety checks in the first week of a new program
- Vehicles failed the tests mostly because of a low-quality brake systems and excessive black smoke emissions
- In better news, only three of 10,236 drivers failed the exam
About one in seven public Thai transport vehicles have failed safety checks in the first week of a new program introduced by the Department of Land Transport. Of the 7,088 vehicles tested nationwide from September 2-11, in attempt to improve the standard of public transport, as many as 1,020 have not made the grade.
The department ordered land transport offices nationwide to conduct a full check-up of public transport vehicles and drivers.
DLT director-general Peerapol Thavornsubhajaroen says the check-up campaign is will take up to three months to complete.
“During the first week, September 2-11, we already performed checks on 7,088 vehicles and found that 1,020 of them failed the evaluation.”
The Nation reports that 1,212 of the tested vehicles were regular route vans, 2,381 were non-regular route vans, 2,219 regular route buses, 838 non-regular route buses, and 438 minibuses. Vehicles failed the evaluation mostly because of a low-quality brake system, excessive black smoke emissions or an unauthorised modification to engines and gear systems.
“We ordered the owners to fix their failed vehicles and bring them back for another check-up within 15 days.”
There was better news concerning the public transport drivers, with three of 10,236 drivers failing the exam.
“We have already advised them how to prepare themselves before taking a remedial exam.”
The director-general said the vehicle tests include checks of the engine, vehicle body integrity, brake system, wheel alignment, lights, smoke emissions, acoustics, as well as ensuring there were no gas leaks.
Driver were checked for physical fitness, colour blindness, reactions, their eyes, as well as a test on their general suitability as a public transport service provider.
Operators of public transport can bring their vehicles and drivers for a check-up at all land transport branches daily from 8.30am to 4.30pm, said Peerapol.
SOURCE: The Nation
Keep in contact with The Thaiger by following our Facebook page.
Expats3 days agoWhy the Chinese are more important than Western tourists to Thailand
Entertainment3 days agoHistoric discovery of earliest sound films shot in Thailand
Pattaya3 days agoFamily of Thai woman seriously injured in Pattaya balcony fall blames French husband
Business2 days agoUS Fed poised to cut rates this week
Politics3 days agoProposal: New law that will allow six cannabis plants per Thai household
Pattaya3 days agoPattaya tourist racks up 50,000 tab after ringing bar bell 20 times
Environment3 days agoPhuket’s Surin Beach’s anti-erosion walls fails causing another environmental disaster
Environment2 days agoMore than half of the tigers moved from the Tiger Temple have died














































![วินาทีฮือฮาทั้งประชุมสภา รัฐบาลเสียงปริ่มน้ำ แพ้โหวตฝ่ายค้านครั้งแรก [คลิป] | The Thaiger](https://thethaiger.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/เสียงปริ่มน้ำ-80x80.jpg)






