Brics declaration criticises unilateral sanctions, calls for peaceful conflict resolution
Brics urges end to unilateral sanctions and advocates for peaceful conflict resolutions
The Kazan Declaration, finalised at the Brics Summit, voiced concerns about the negative impact of unlawful unilateral coercive measures, including illegal sanctions, on the global economy, trade, and the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals. The declaration noted that such measures undermine the UN Charter, the multilateral trading system, sustainable development, and environmental agreements.
Although the declaration did not directly mention the Russia-Ukraine conflict, it highlighted concerns over the “rise of violence and continuing armed conflicts” and advocated for peaceful dispute resolutions through diplomacy, inclusive dialogue, and consultations. It emphasised the importance of engaging in conflict prevention by addressing their root causes.
On Wednesday, the Ukrainian foreign ministry commented that the Brics summit declaration showed the organisation lacked a unified stance on the Ukraine war. The ministry’s statement asserted that Moscow’s attempts to promote an alternative view of the Global South regarding Russian aggression against Ukraine had once again failed, revealing that Brics did not have a joint position on the matter.
⚡️Kazan Declaration of the BRICS Summit:
—The emergence of new centers of power can lay the foundations for a new world order
—Reaffirms support for an open, fair, inclusive multilateral trading system
—Concerned about the negative impact of unilateral illegitimate measures… pic.twitter.com/PZEbYVHpS0— The Global Monitor (@theglobalmonit) October 23, 2024
The declaration also expressed deep concern over the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and southern Lebanon. It highlighted the “unprecedented escalation of violence in the Gaza Strip and West Bank due to the Israeli military offensive,” which resulted in mass civilian casualties, forced displacement, and extensive damage to civilian infrastructure. It called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the unconditional release of hostages and detainees from both sides, the unrestricted supply of humanitarian aid to Gaza, and the cessation of all aggressive actions.
The Brics states condemned all forms of terrorism, labelling it a common threat requiring a comprehensive and balanced approach. They recognised that any acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable, irrespective of their motivations, and stressed the need for a strong collective response to persistent and emerging terrorist threats. The declaration called for decisive measures to counter cross-border terrorist movement, terror financing, and other forms of support.
What Other Media Are Saying
- PBS NewsHour: Putin hosts a BRICS summit in Kazan, focusing on financial cooperation and expansion, aiming to challenge Western global clout and shape a multipolar world order.(read more)
Frequently Asked Questions
Here are some common questions asked about this news
What concerns did the Kazan Declaration raise?
Negative impacts of unlawful unilateral coercive measures on the global economy, trade, and Sustainable Development Goals.
Did the Kazan Declaration mention the Russia-Ukraine conflict?
No, but it expressed concerns over violence and armed conflicts, advocating for peaceful resolutions.
What was Ukraine’s reaction to the Brics summit declaration?
Ukraine’s foreign ministry said it showed Brics lacked a unified stance on the Ukraine war.
What did the Kazan Declaration say about the situation in Gaza and the West Bank?
It condemned the violence, called for a ceasefire, release of hostages, humanitarian aid access, and end to aggression.
How did the Brics states address terrorism in the Kazan Declaration?
They condemned all terrorism, called for a balanced approach, and stressed countering cross-border terrorist movements and financing.
