Here is the table from ONS, so all can choose what they like:
To me, from that data, one has chosen to quote "deaths involving Covid-19" and added those numbers to "Non Covid-19 deaths" to back up their case. Add the 3 numbers under each column for "Deaths within 21 days" and you will see that 4,388 +14,265 + 182 + 11,470 equals 30,305 as mentioned in the "Expose" article.
Equally using just the Covid-19 deaths you will see by adding 4,388 and 182 together equals 4,570 which is the actual figure cited in the "Fact Checker's" argument.
So which is correct. To me neither. Both numbers do not demonstrate the intention of the writer of the original article. In my view, the "newspaper's" intention is to deliver a "sensationalist" feeling that vaccines themselves are causing death or do not prevent death from Covid-19. Nothing more. Otherwise, why would you highlight vaccination status when looking at deaths?
The above table from ONS shows the death data. Read it as you choose. But, in my opinion, you would need to further look at the Monthly Mortality Analysis to understand deaths from the vaccines. (Note - This report is a rolling 6 month period so the data is actually March to August 2021. There are archived copies of other months.)
Here is a table from the latest completed report that seems to show deaths caused by vaccines (Code U12.9) . Perhaps one of the members who is a Doctor can better explain how the coding works etc than me.
Draw your own conclusions.
My apologies if this has already been posted...This is an incredibly powerful statement from where we were, where we are and where we are going...Very few opinions (and they are from very credible sources) and lots of facts.